Published: Jun 3, 2013 | Updated: Jun 4, 2013
By Nancy Walsh , Staff Writer, MedPage Today
Action Points
- Vegetarian diets are associated with lower all-cause mortality and with some reductions in cause-specific mortality.
- Associations in men were larger and more often significant than were those in women.
People who followed a vegetarian diet had a lower risk for death from any cause, and men in particular also saw benefits for cardiovascular mortality, a large prospective study found.
Among individuals who adhered to any type of vegetarian diet, the adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.97), according to Michael J. Orlich, MD, and colleagues from Loma Linda University in California.
And for men, cardiovascular mortality was significantly lower (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.90), as was death from ischemic heart disease (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-1), the researchers reported online in JAMA Internal Medicine.
“Vegetarian dietary patterns have been associated with reductions in risk for several chronic diseases, such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and ischemic heart disease, which might be expected to result in lower mortality,” they wrote.
However, previous mortality studies have had contradictory results, so Orlich and colleagues sought to clarify the uncertainty by analyzing outcomes for 73,308 participants in the Adventist Health Study 2.
Mean age was 58, and roughly two-thirds were women.
Dietary patterns were assessed on a food frequency questionnaire at baseline.
Participants were classified as vegans if they avoided eggs, dairy, fish, and meat (7.6%); lacto-ovo-vegetarians if they ate eggs and dairy but avoided fish and meat (28.9%); pesco-vegetarians if they consumed fish but not meat (9.8%); and semi-vegetarian if they ate fish or meat no more than once weekly (5.5%).
The remaining 48.2% were nonvegetarians.
Adherence to the vegetarian diets ranged from 19 to 39 years.
During a mean follow-up of 5.79 years, there were 2,570 deaths.
While for men the risk all-cause mortality was significantly reduced (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.94), the reduction for women was not significant (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.05).
For men and women combined, no significant reductions in mortality from ischemic heart disease, cardiovascular disease, or cancer were found, although there was a decrease for “other” causes of death (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.99).
Unlike men, women had no significant reductions in deaths from cardiovascular disease or ischemic heart disease.
Both male and female pesco-vegetarians had lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.94), as did male and female lacto-ovo-vegetarians (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.82-1).
Pesco-vegetarians also had reduced risk for death from ischemic heart disease (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.97), and male pesco-vegetarian were at lower risk for death from cardiovascular disease (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.98).
Men who followed a vegan diet fared particularly well:
- All-cause mortality, HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.56-0.92)
- Death from ischemic heart disease, HR 0.45 (95% CI 0.21-0.94)
- Death from cardiovascular disease, HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.38-0.89)
“Vegetarian diets have been associated with more favorable levels of of cardiovascular risk factors, and nutrient profiles of the vegetarian dietary patterns suggest possible reasons for reduced cardiovascular risk, such as lower saturated fat and higher fiber consumption,” Orlich and colleagues observed.
The researchers also looked at specific causes of mortality in the “other” category, and found that for both sexes, renal mortality was lower for all types of vegetarians (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.82), as was mortality from endocrine causes (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.92).
There were no clear reductions in deaths from cancer, the researchers pointed out.
“The heterogeneous nature of cancer may obscure specific diet-cancer associations in analyses of combined cancer mortality, and lack of significance may reflect insufficient power to detect weaker associations at early follow-up,” they explained.
It remains unclear why the effects were stronger in men.
“Future analysis will evaluate possible effect modification by sex for particular foods or nutrients, which may suggest sex-specific mechanisms,” they wrote.
In an invited commentary, Robert B. Baron, MD, of the University of California San Francisco, noted that many people who choose to eat a vegetarian diet do so for ethical, religious, and environmental reasons, rather than for health benefits, and clinicians who advise patients on diet must keep those factors in mind.
“First and foremost, dietary advice needs to be given to patients based on their own dietary history and preferences, their motivation to change their diet, and their clinical circumstances,” Baron wrote.
“Although nutrition authorities may disagree about the optimal balance of macronutrients in an ideal diet, and the amount of meat and other specific foods that should be ingested, virtually all agree that diets should limit added sugars and sugary drinks, refined grains, and large amounts of saturated and transfats,” he added.
Limitations of the study included its short follow-up period and the potential for confounding by non-dietary factors.
The study was supported by the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture.
The lead author reported receiving small honoraria from California conferences of Seventh Day Adventists.
From the American Heart Association: