Eur Spine J. 2014 Aug;23(8):1725-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3385-9. Epub 2014 May 28.
Lao L, Daubs MD, Scott TP, Phan KH, Wang JC.
Abstract
PURPOSE:
To determine if adding flexion and extension MRI studies to the traditional neutral views would be beneficial in the diagnosis of cervical disc bulges.
METHODS:
Five hundred patients underwent MRI in neutral, flexion and extension positions. The images were analyzed using computer software to objectively quantify the amount of disc bulge.
RESULTS:
Compared to the neutral position, cervical disc bulges were significantly increased in the extension position (P < 0.05), but on flexion position, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). For patients without or <3 mm of disc bulge in neutral, 2.97% demonstrated an increase in bulge to ≥3 mm bulge in flexion, and 16.41% demonstrated an increase to ≥3 mm bulge in extension. For patients in the neutral view that had a baseline disc bulge of 3-5 mm, 3.73% had increased bulges to ≥5 mm in flexion and 11.57% had increased bulges to ≥5 mm in extension.
CONCLUSION:
A significant increase in the degree of cervical disc bulge was found by examining extension views when compared with neutral views alone. Kinematic MRI views provide valuable added information, especially in situations where symptomatic radiculopathy is present without any abnormalities demonstrated on traditional neutral MRI.
PMID: 24866257 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3385-9